Two Managers Pressure Volunteer at Picnic Table

Failed to load video
Chapters
Transcript
[0:00] yeah
[0:03] a think about some observations that
[0:06] I've been having you know your time here
[0:08] at the park and you know also recognize
[0:11] all the work that you've been doing um
[0:13] so you did you've been doing a great job
[0:14] at the Welcome Center you've also been
[0:16] doing a great job on the as recently as
[0:19] the Y had a lost and found drum and you
[0:21] turned it in follow all the procedures
[0:23] 100% correctly so that's great right and
[0:25] so thank you um so I want to you
[0:28] recognize the good stuff um doing uh
[0:31] here at the park um worked a double
[0:33] stayed an hour past that to help
[0:34] somebody yep yep so you're definitely
[0:37] providing that service you know that um
[0:39] you know the day-to-day operational
[0:41] service that we're after with the park
[0:44] um I care about this place that's good
[0:46] that's good that's what I mean I think
[0:48] all of us do right and that's why we're
[0:50] here we have that shared value and that
[0:53] shared you know belief of like why we're
[0:55] here and providing the service for
[0:56] people so so that's right that's right
[0:58] on that's good that's I glad to hear
[1:00] that and that's awesome that that that
[1:02] you do feel that way because that's the
[1:04] same way I feel I know that's the same
[1:05] way Katie feels and that's the same way
[1:07] all the Rangers feel and all the you
[1:09] know other volunteers you know like
[1:11] that's a you know something that we hold
[1:14] and talk about pretty often you know as
[1:15] a crew um of you know why we're here and
[1:18] why we're doing what we're doing you
[1:20] know so um is there anything you said
[1:23] you wanted to talk is there anything you
[1:24] want to talk about before we get before
[1:27] we um kind of get going
[1:30] I'd like to hear what you have to say
[1:32] okay yeah no worries yeah so um so yeah
[1:35] first off I just wanted like I said
[1:36] recognize all the efforts um that that
[1:40] you've been doing and you know I just
[1:42] some observation I'll start with some
[1:43] observations and so kind of my role as a
[1:47] park manager is to I want everybody to
[1:49] set up for success and some of that at
[1:53] times is you know providing expectations
[1:56] for people you know moving forward kind
[1:58] of you know you're brand new and state
[2:00] parks you think you hosted for a little
[2:03] while down ataw tugman right and so
[2:06] you're still learning the ropes yourself
[2:07] and getting understand had to navigate a
[2:10] lot of understanding like you know what
[2:13] we do when we do it why we do it how we
[2:14] do it and it can be a lot you know for
[2:16] people
[2:17] to um figure a lot of stuff out right
[2:21] and so hopefully that's where you know I
[2:24] come in as a manager Kitty comes in as R
[2:25] supervisor and all the Rangers are there
[2:27] to provide support and help as well
[2:30] to all the volunteers that that's really
[2:32] our role right you guys are part of our
[2:34] team and part of one big thing of our
[2:37] team operating principles is being
[2:40] supportive of each other you know and
[2:43] and so that can be interpreted in
[2:45] different ways right you know you know
[2:48] how supported people are are not you
[2:50] know and just so you know I've seen some
[2:53] you know I've seen some correspondents
[2:55] from you that kind
[2:58] of leads me to believe that that you
[3:01] believe that people aren't being
[3:02] supportive of you um and then you know
[3:06] also I would say I've been seen some
[3:09] stuff that may not be supportive of the
[3:11] crew and kind of what we're doing as
[3:13] well um so I have a just some talking
[3:16] points here of things I'd like to
[3:18] address and um and talk about and just
[3:21] so we're on the same page you know
[3:23] you're on the same page as I am and we
[3:25] have an understanding and a clear
[3:27] pathway forward for your success as a
[3:29] volunteer here okay I'm listening as you
[3:31] come through here you're going to go to
[3:32] other parks and um you know other Parks
[3:35] will have um EXA you almost got to
[3:38] relearn not relearn everything right but
[3:40] they do things differently at each Park
[3:43] um and so you know some of that is
[3:45] having you know patience and
[3:47] understanding where those processes but
[3:49] so anyway so um you know we have a lot
[3:52] of volunteers that come through the park
[3:54] regularly you know people that have been
[3:56] returning for 10 to 20 years you know
[3:59] like literally 20 20 years right and uh
[4:04] they interact with you know other
[4:05] volunteers they inter interact with the
[4:09] staff right and but there's an
[4:12] observation that I've made in the the
[4:16] month that you've been here is um and
[4:19] this is in correspondence coming from
[4:21] you directly in emails and texts to park
[4:24] rangers or myself or Katie um is that
[4:29] you know you've express some
[4:30] dissatisfaction with multiple members of
[4:33] the crew I mean myself Katie Logan Leaf
[4:37] Pat I don't agree with that okay well
[4:39] yeah so like I said that's just the
[4:42] observation I've made on the emails that
[4:44] I've seen from you well I don't agree
[4:46] with that and that's fine and and you
[4:48] don't have to agree with it um but I am
[4:52] communicating what my expectations are
[4:54] for you as a volunteer here at the park
[4:57] well I want you to know my petition as
[4:58] well I have never said anything I've
[5:00] never had a criticism towards you
[5:02] towards Leaf um it's just that's not how
[5:05] I we'll get more into we'll get more
[5:07] into it uh as we go along here um so
[5:11] long story short is after you have
[5:13] arrived it does appear that there you're
[5:15] having issues with different Park staff
[5:17] you know it started out with Katie at
[5:18] the beginning of the month and then I
[5:21] came and talked to you as a normal
[5:22] conversation I would with anybody else
[5:24] and that conversation didn't sit well
[5:26] with you either I think we rectified
[5:28] that through email
[5:30] right but it just there's I've observed
[5:33] a trend over the month that you've been
[5:35] here is that when somebody tries to
[5:37] provide you guidance or feedback um you
[5:41] take it as that
[5:42] they're like don't trust you or that
[5:45] they're um you know don't think that
[5:47] you're capable of understanding um I
[5:50] think recently I heard that you had
[5:51] requested that you know like a certain
[5:54] park ranger didn't lead an orientation
[5:57] right and so um one expectation I have I
[6:00] didn't request that I spoke to um Logan
[6:03] on the phone and I told him that every
[6:05] time Patrick and I interacted he was
[6:08] condescending towards me and he said
[6:09] that leaf would train me gotcha that was
[6:12] what Logan said to me I took him at his
[6:15] word right yeah my understand with that
[6:18] is that Logan was saying that he would
[6:19] look into it it wasn't like guarantee
[6:21] not what happened it was it's not what
[6:23] happened it's yeah it's it's fine like I
[6:26] said this isn't an argument so um we're
[6:29] not we're not doing an argument here so
[6:31] um long story short is any Ranger at any
[6:34] time will provide training to any
[6:36] volunteer here and I and I went to the
[6:38] training great um that's awesome and
[6:41] that and that's all we could ask for um
[6:44] but I would ask that you know with that
[6:46] being is that like um so in that
[6:49] instance I saw some feedback directly
[6:51] from you saying that Patrick was
[6:53] condescending towards you know the
[6:55] volunteers and the
[6:56] orientation and from what I understand
[6:59] from your words is that um you felt that
[7:03] with r with Patrick saying that like you
[7:07] know I'm here to provide support for you
[7:09] or something of that nature and he you
[7:12] said he repeated it multiple times in
[7:13] the conversation over the course of an
[7:15] hour he kept bringing it out but that
[7:16] wasn't the main point yeah so but it
[7:19] seemed like that was a a sign but I
[7:21] navigate it I navigate you know things I
[7:24] don't really have an issue with Patrick
[7:25] he's you know easy to navigate okay um
[7:28] the problem was was that Logan lied to
[7:30] me that's a fact well and and just so
[7:33] you know too um Logan came to me so Leaf
[7:36] was out sick right the day prior to the
[7:39] orientation and we we did not know if he
[7:41] was going to be available to even do an
[7:43] orientation right okay and so I also
[7:45] wasn't communicated to me well you're
[7:47] right and so and I even told Logan is
[7:49] like regardless is like Patrick was
[7:51] scheduled for the orientation like he
[7:54] was scheduled to do the orientation and
[7:56] so an expectation I have as a park
[7:58] manager for our volunteers and our staff
[8:01] is that we got to get along log with
[8:02] each other and so by Patrick not doing
[8:04] the orientation that was not an option
[8:06] so Patrick was doing the
[8:09] orientation regardless right and so from
[8:13] my understanding talking about Patrick I
[8:14] heard nothing in the conversation from
[8:16] Patrick that
[8:17] would for me to believe that he was not
[8:22] supportive of the volunteers and he's
[8:25] very plain what what I had heard is that
[8:27] he was offering help that's what I heard
[8:30] and it sound like what you heard is that
[8:31] he repeated himself and was insinuating
[8:34] that you weren't capable of
[8:36] understanding look I'm not sure what you
[8:38] want me to say I have already said yeah
[8:41] no and I told you I navigate him you
[8:44] know like I do everybody no fair enough
[8:46] and I Logan is my direct supervisor I
[8:48] tried to explain to him that every time
[8:50] Patrick comes to see me he is
[8:52] condescending towards me this is just
[8:54] the way it is and I navigate it and I
[8:56] knew that if I was in a training
[8:57] environment with him that that put him
[9:00] in a position of authority over where he
[9:02] could be even more condescending and I
[9:03] wanted to avoid that situation and Logan
[9:06] said that he would deal with it and have
[9:07] believe trained me and I believed him
[9:09] gotta so yeah and yeah I so I understand
[9:12] you have a conflict with Patrick not
[9:14] really okay I wanted to avoid a
[9:16] situation I wanted to prevent a
[9:18] situation right so so it sounds like you
[9:22] have an understanding of maybe what some
[9:24] triggers are for you right maybe Patrick
[9:26] does and you're navigating around those
[9:28] that's what I just heard you say if
[9:31] that's
[9:32] correct
[9:34] um I mean I don't know that I would call
[9:36] it a trigger because I do um like I said
[9:40] I navigate the situation it's just I I
[9:43] recognize the way he's talking to me and
[9:46] I don't think that he's conscious of it
[9:48] I don't think he's he's you know out to
[9:51] get me or something I just know that the
[9:54] way he
[9:55] it's okay fair fair enough yeah so so I
[9:59] give that and like um but just so I am
[10:03] being clear on this is that like you
[10:05] know Patrick is still a ranger and like
[10:08] he's interacted with lots of always
[10:10] respectful with him that's good that's
[10:11] that's great and my hope is that he is
[10:13] with you and if he's not then please let
[10:14] me know and we'll work on that but just
[10:17] so when and I you know I know Patrick
[10:20] right I worked with him for quite a few
[10:22] years and other volunteers who work with
[10:23] Patrick over the years and stuff and so
[10:26] I when I hear Patrick say this is this
[10:28] is my perspective when I hear Patrick
[10:30] say be like I'm here to help or just
[10:32] give me a call if you need anything when
[10:34] Patrick says that I take that as like
[10:36] that's Patrick
[10:37] genuinely I don't have this not about
[10:39] that it's really not about that it's
[10:42] like I mean trying Let me refresh my
[10:44] memory here the first thing he said was
[10:46] don't get your hopes up he said that
[10:48] twice and it was the way he said it
[10:50] refering like the schedule yeah it was
[10:52] like I was just asking a question about
[10:54] the schedule and then he just kept going
[10:56] on and on and on about it but that's not
[10:57] even so like a couple days before that
[10:59] I'm at the Welcome Center I have to do
[11:01] the um I had to escalate a situation I
[11:04] called all of you trying to you know
[11:05] including him and then he came in and
[11:08] said that he had to leave earlier and
[11:10] then described that whole call log to me
[11:12] like I hadn't just done it it's it's
[11:14] just the way he comes across it's like
[11:18] he's yeah and and so yeah and like in
[11:21] that situ just from for me hearing that
[11:23] right what when and obviously I I can't
[11:28] like
[11:29] I can I was just trying to avoid a
[11:31] situation and I believe understand how
[11:33] you're feeling or how that comes across
[11:35] right but when when I hear that to me it
[11:39] just sounds like Patrick's trying to
[11:41] he's being Patrick I understand I truly
[11:43] understand I think he's just trying to
[11:44] communicate because Patrick loves
[11:46] communication he likes lots of
[11:47] communication and and you almost have to
[11:50] overc communicate with Patrick in
[11:52] general and so the way I navigate him is
[11:54] I'll say we're good patri we're good but
[11:57] he hasn't picked up on that yet like I'm
[11:59] literally just trying to have a smooth
[12:01] relationship with everybody gotta and
[12:04] because Patrick wasn't picking up on it
[12:06] every single interaction went like that
[12:07] I was like okay if he trains me that
[12:10] could go very badly let's try to avoid
[12:12] that well yeah and and here's and the
[12:14] other thing too is that I would
[12:15] encourage people if if you are having
[12:18] like an issue like that like having a
[12:19] conversation like we're having I had one
[12:21] with Logan well Logan's not Patrick
[12:23] though and and Logan is not so what I
[12:26] would say is that something would need
[12:27] to happen with Patrick so like if I'm
[12:29] have a conversation and I'm hearing this
[12:31] I I have a thing that says I hear that
[12:33] Patrick and he is somehow supposed to
[12:36] know that that means like I'm you're
[12:39] saying be more direct with them you guys
[12:41] don't like it when I'm direct you guys
[12:42] don't like it so what am I supposed to
[12:44] do no I think it's not it's not what you
[12:46] say it's how you say it right and so
[12:49] it's I think typically even with like
[12:52] rule enforcement in the campground right
[12:54] is not what we're saying it's how we're
[12:56] saying it right so if I show up into the
[12:58] campsite and I say hey shut the [ __ ] up
[13:00] you know like be quiet it's quiet hour
[13:02] right or if I say hi good afternoon my
[13:04] name is Ryan I'm Oran State
[13:08] Park you pass I can hear the noise
[13:10] coming from down the
[13:13] loop right the exact same thing in a
[13:16] different way right and so yeah and so
[13:18] that's I can think on that because I
[13:20] have I've thought about it it's like how
[13:21] do I explain this to Patrick that he's
[13:24] right overe explaining and just well and
[13:29] and just just so I mean from my
[13:31] perspective as a manager like you're a
[13:32] quick guy like I can say something to
[13:35] you and you get it and you're quick
[13:38] right not everybody is that not
[13:40] everybody is like that right like
[13:42] literally
[13:44] sometimes like overc communicating right
[13:47] is a form of making sure that somebody
[13:49] understands so a good way to do that
[13:51] what I've noticed sometimes is effective
[13:53] as a communicator is to paraphrase back
[13:56] to them what it is that you heard
[13:59] okay and by doing that they say oh yep
[14:02] they got it I don't need to say it again
[14:04] right but if I just say I'm hearing this
[14:06] I just saym they're like did they
[14:09] understand that you know it can create
[14:11] some mystery there and so that's what I
[14:13] mean when I say we're good but I get
[14:14] we're saying right and so yeah I think
[14:16] that's your form of saying we're good I
[14:18] got you like I told to tell what you
[14:20] been saying and you don't need to
[14:21] paraphrase back all you you know and
[14:23] yeah and so but so I I totally
[14:27] understand where you're com I get that I
[14:29] am not your normal volunteer okay and
[14:32] this is a hard thing to navigate um I'm
[14:35] doing my best no and that's and that's
[14:36] what that's all we could ask but in the
[14:39] situation and like I said you know I
[14:42] mean I've never truly had a problem with
[14:43] Patrick like there's been no
[14:44] confrontation with them you know it's
[14:46] always been respectful well that's good
[14:49] you know but just from my perspective as
[14:51] a manager yeah just when I see like
[14:55] emails or text messages in regards to
[14:57] and that's another thing so I have been
[14:59] a freelancer all of my life which means
[15:02] I'm always emailing and this is a state
[15:04] agency thing where um you guys treat it
[15:08] differently than I do and I'm trying to
[15:10] navigate I even try to talk to Logan
[15:12] without sending emails right you know
[15:14] I'm trying to adapt to you guys right um
[15:18] well I wouldn't say is necessarily the
[15:20] emails are the issue with that I
[15:23] communication it's good to communicate
[15:24] it's healthy to communicate and so like
[15:27] do you really mean this I do so like to
[15:29] be a healthy crew is that we have to be
[15:31] able to communicate with each other
[15:33] right and so like I think you know for
[15:36] my understanding of when I was looking
[15:40] through some corresponden and stuff that
[15:42] J had sent is that like by Logan sharing
[15:45] information with like the park manager
[15:48] or Katie is that it led you to distrust
[15:51] him no I know nothing about this I don't
[15:53] know what you're saying so that is that
[15:55] was very clearly in the emails in
[15:57] regards nothing I've said yeah yeah okay
[16:00] no I'm yeah what I have no idea what
[16:03] you're talking about I truly don't fair
[16:04] enough fair enough yeah okay so um I why
[16:07] would I care if he shared something with
[16:09] you I that's not not at all Ryan
[16:12] seriously okay um go back and read it
[16:14] cuz I don't know what you're talking
[16:15] about but I I believe that word was used
[16:18] in there in regards to Logan and being
[16:20] able to to trust him no it's not in
[16:24] there so yeah so just it's not in there
[16:27] fair enough truly not and I think like
[16:29] even you C you sent Logan an email and
[16:31] then you cced Katie on it saying that I
[16:34] know you're going to give this to Katie
[16:35] anyway oh okay so I can explain that I
[16:37] can explain that yeah yeah I can explain
[16:40] that though so I learned from from
[16:42] Frankie the vssl at a different part
[16:45] that when you say something that's even
[16:47] slightly negative and this was a very
[16:49] direct response to Logan that it
[16:51] automatically goes to the supervisor so
[16:53] I knew you would receive a
[16:55] copy that's it okay got you
[17:00] fair enough but yeah so it just to so
[17:04] for me how it came across for for me
[17:06] okay is that um you know I knew I knew
[17:11] that she would receive a copy and I
[17:13] didn't want her to think that it was
[17:14] something I was hiding so I sent it to
[17:16] her directly that makes that makes sense
[17:17] and though just my interpretation of
[17:20] that whole thing was that like I know I
[17:22] can't trust you with information Logan
[17:24] so I'm going to give it to the people
[17:26] that are going to show it
[17:27] to that's how it
[17:29] I'm sorry is not how it was meant at all
[17:32] fair fair enough fair enough but that is
[17:34] definitely how it came across so as a
[17:35] manager I'm thinking oh man like I mean
[17:38] like this is an issue like you know like
[17:41] Sam doesn't feel that he can trust I
[17:43] mean that's why I said I'm not
[17:45] escalating I'm informing trying to
[17:47] prevent that actually so I yeah so and
[17:52] literally not escalating like well I
[17:55] well I I know and and so that could be
[17:58] tough is like sometimes when people say
[18:00] hey I don't want to start well that's
[18:01] why we're talking they say I don't want
[18:02] to start a problem but you know then you
[18:05] tell I am a very direct person I mean
[18:07] what I say mean I wrong with him you
[18:09] know sometimes that could be like I
[18:11] think you don't want to start a problem
[18:12] you know but then I'm very honest and
[18:14] direct I mean what I say I truly do so
[18:18] you do not have to be reading subtext
[18:20] for me I mean what I say okay if it gets
[18:23] misinterpreted that does happen because
[18:26] um one thing I've learned is a lot of
[18:28] people people they attach things to like
[18:30] okay take the word difficult for example
[18:32] is something I've learned this past year
[18:34] when I use the word difficult I'm just
[18:35] describing a situation that is a little
[18:38] complicated but people attach emotions
[18:40] to that I don't do that right that's um
[18:44] I think that people probably do that
[18:45] with all kinds of language that I don't
[18:48] even know about like these are things
[18:49] I'm just learning that people treat
[18:51] language I treat it very very direct and
[18:53] plain I mean what I say right no you're
[18:56] you're right there are definitely
[18:59] inferences or inflections on certain
[19:04] words Us in certain ways I mean even
[19:06] down to like if lettering is bolded in a
[19:09] in a paragraph I mean like that
[19:11] insinuates that like has like a a tone
[19:15] like a negative tone could be perceived
[19:17] as like a negative or threatening tone
[19:19] like you know kind of like putting
[19:21] exclamation points behind something like
[19:23] put like 25 exclamation points so let's
[19:26] get to the real issue here okay
[19:29] uh I don't trust Logan he has not given
[19:32] me any reason to trust him and I have
[19:34] laid out why and because of that I do
[19:38] not want him ruining my future I had to
[19:41] do something about that right I had to
[19:43] make sure that he could not ruin my
[19:45] future right that is why we here right
[19:49] well yeah and so I mean I would I
[19:52] understand that maybe there are a lot of
[19:55] reasons Ryan that you believe that Logan
[19:57] is part of your future right no but no
[20:00] but however he is capable of
[20:02] interrupting my future while I'm here
[20:04] and you are as well so you as a person
[20:07] holds the highest responsibility of that
[20:10] disruption not happening and that's why
[20:13] we're here to talk with you it's not
[20:15] about Logan at all like this about well
[20:17] you started bringing up um Bolding
[20:20] things and that's the only time I've
[20:21] ever bolded something in an email so I
[20:23] made an inference there and I'm just
[20:24] explaining this is why that email was
[20:26] sent because
[20:30] I I was just trying to I was just trying
[20:33] to have you understand that by doing
[20:36] those there are inflections of words
[20:37] because it sounded like before when we
[20:39] were talking that you didn't understand
[20:41] that there were inflections with words
[20:43] but it sounds like you do understand is
[20:45] what I just heard because you said you
[20:47] wanted to make a point so you bolded
[20:48] them I absolutely wanted to make a point
[20:50] with that em all right so we're on the
[20:52] same page with that so um so we do
[20:55] understand that words you know can have
[20:57] some yeah they can easily get
[20:59] misinterpreted too though I mean that's
[21:01] also what we're talking about so correct
[21:03] yes they can go both ways on that right
[21:07] know it certainly can and so that's why
[21:10] we're here talking about stuff and set
[21:12] the expectations moving forward right
[21:15] so uh part of us as a crew um so one
[21:19] thing I could ask for you directly is to
[21:23] um only have conversations with Park
[21:25] staff that don't result in things like
[21:27] threats or demands over emails or texts
[21:31] okay so that would be things like hey
[21:33] I'm you know requesting that you help me
[21:35] get a job and somewhere else or it be
[21:38] like I am prepared to fight this or not
[21:41] let you stand in my way so those things
[21:44] come across as threats and they could
[21:48] they can make people feel not good when
[21:51] they're being threatened and it it makes
[21:53] them not want to engage with somebody
[21:55] else if they feel like they're being
[21:57] threat right okay so so I would just ask
[22:00] that moving forward m is that you know
[22:03] you don't engage in that sort of um
[22:06] verbage of either demanding or you know
[22:09] threatening never made a demand gotcha
[22:12] okay understood but from from so it
[22:15] should be easy then moving absolutely
[22:17] I've never made a demand to not do that
[22:19] um and so the goals of our agency is to
[22:23] you know to being like supportive of
[22:25] each other and welcoming to everybody
[22:28] here and we're we're this is why we're
[22:30] having a conversation with you as well
[22:32] is that we are really trying
[22:34] to have you understand kind of what our
[22:38] observations are and kind of what our
[22:40] expectations are moving forward to to
[22:42] make you be successful and so this isn't
[22:44] like a Logan Thing versus whatever this
[22:46] is a Sam thing and I'm the the park
[22:49] manager I'm responsible for all the
[22:50] employees that are here at the park all
[22:52] the volunteers all the employees and all
[22:55] the people that come from our park and
[22:56] go to different parks and I've been in
[22:59] the agency for 15 years now and I've
[23:01] been in management for half of that and
[23:04] I've seen a little bit of everything
[23:06] from all the way from a Parker Ranger
[23:08] assistant all the way through all the
[23:10] disciplinary processes of a manager and
[23:13] and all the HR stuff right
[23:17] and what I have found to be the most
[23:19] successful thing when somebody comes and
[23:22] talks to
[23:23] me is for me to say you know what I did
[23:25] not see it that way I will do my best to
[23:29] you know change these things moving
[23:31] forward those people are the most
[23:33] successful people in like in their
[23:36] career and in their future I've had a
[23:37] few his opportunities over my career
[23:40] where somebody came and talked to me and
[23:42] it felt like I was chewing on glass
[23:44] right and all I had to do is keep
[23:46] chewing that glass and swallow it right
[23:49] but because of that providing that
[23:51] feedback made me a better person it made
[23:53] me stronger and it made me more
[23:55] resilient and it made me have a better
[23:58] understanding of what my role is and
[24:00] what I'm doing and where I wanted to be
[24:03] in the future right so the conversation
[24:05] we're having is is no different than the
[24:07] conversation that I have been through
[24:09] multiple times in my life right and in
[24:12] particularly even here at this career
[24:14] right
[24:15] so part of why we're talking about this
[24:17] is we want to support the goals of the
[24:19] agency and um and we'll get more into
[24:25] you know the explanation and stuff like
[24:28] that so so and at the park you know
[24:30] we're very big on assuming positive
[24:32] intent right and so it's it's a lot
[24:35] easier said than done right so and this
[24:38] this can be this can go both ways right
[24:41] so the with us as a crew we want to see
[24:44] positive intent for each other want to
[24:46] assume positive intent for the public
[24:48] right so like for example if a um I'll
[24:52] tell a real world example there was a
[24:54] camper camping in Sea and had a pretty
[25:00] beat up Ford Ranger right it had a lot
[25:03] of dents in it spray painted ra can it
[25:06] had a lot of contents in the back of the
[25:09] truck right so at first glance if
[25:12] somebody was not assuming positive
[25:14] intent they might think that these
[25:15] people are up to nefarious activity or
[25:18] they're doing something like they're
[25:20] stealing stuff right so uh we actually
[25:23] had a park coost obviously it's not you
[25:25] so right this is years ago so we had a
[25:27] park host
[25:29] that made contact with them and
[25:31] essentially accused them of stealing
[25:33] stuff in the camp room with no prior
[25:35] knowledge of knowing whether they had
[25:37] paid or not okay well it turned out that
[25:41] that camper was an actual paid camper
[25:45] they came in they were moving across
[25:47] country they didn't have a lot of
[25:49] funding right so they had a lot of stuff
[25:51] with them and it
[25:53] was packed in maybe a a way that you
[25:56] weren't assuming positive intent
[25:59] that set you up for a bad uh interaction
[26:01] with that person right so what do you
[26:04] think happened when the park CL went up
[26:06] to that person and said hey what are you
[26:08] doing here it looks like you're stealing
[26:10] stuff and they were a paid
[26:12] camper I mean so you know made them
[26:16] feel bad right terrible essentially so
[26:20] if we were take that same situation and
[26:23] you know assumed that they had
[26:25] paid it sets us up for a better you know
[26:29] interaction with them right so I always
[26:30] say assume positive intent until proven
[26:32] otherwise right so if Katie like has
[26:35] something stuck in her eye and she goes
[26:37] like that I'm not going to think oh God
[26:40] Katie made a weird face at me she must
[26:42] hate me right I'm going to assume until
[26:44] proven otherwise the kitty had something
[26:46] in her eyeball or if she's having a bad
[26:50] day and she cusses cusses under breath
[26:52] at me I might think damn Kitty might be
[26:54] having a bad day right like I'm going to
[26:57] assume that's not Katie like I'm going
[26:59] to assume positive intent towards Katie
[27:02] that she's doing the best she can with
[27:04] what she got and in my role as a team
[27:06] teammate that's my default position with
[27:08] people in general okay that's
[27:11] good M you know I want to you know make
[27:15] sure that um you know I'm providing that
[27:19] support for for her right and giving her
[27:21] space and and and assuming that positive
[27:24] intent right so a big thing we have here
[27:27] at the crew is to is to assume positive
[27:30] because it sets us up better for Success
[27:33] having contact with I agree that's why I
[27:35] said I don't think Patrick is you know
[27:36] he's just being himself I understand
[27:39] okay well that's good yeah so that's
[27:41] good yeah so
[27:45] okay so I guess um one other thing I
[27:48] wanted to ask and this would be kind of
[27:51] an expectation moving forward is that
[27:54] you know that you take us at our word
[27:57] right and so like I take you at your
[27:59] word Ryan well that's good I'm I'm glad
[28:02] but I do my
[28:04] hope well I took Logan at his word also
[28:07] right well and so I would say is like
[28:10] moving forward like Logan Patrick Leaf
[28:13] Nate Haley Katie Hannah like to be like
[28:16] a a good operating crew we have to take
[28:20] all all of each other I take everyone at
[28:22] their work um I also hold them to their
[28:24] work okay fair enough don't you
[28:29] uh yeah I mean I understand sometimes
[28:33] instances change so like for example it
[28:36] it seems like maybe you're holding on to
[28:37] this Logan Patrick Leaf training you
[28:40] thing oh okay all right so if you're not
[28:42] that's fine but U it just seems like
[28:44] maybe that's what you're referring back
[28:45] to and and if you like is you know that
[28:48] could be all be pushed back on me that's
[28:49] not a Logan thing I told Logan
[28:51] absolutely not Patrick's doing the
[28:53] training right so if okay if you do want
[28:55] to be frustrated with anybody on that be
[28:57] frustrated with me on that because it
[28:59] did not seem like from the information I
[29:01] had that we would not be avoiding
[29:05] Patrick doing a trading because Patrick
[29:06] needs to be able to do that training I
[29:08] understand your point of view on this as
[29:09] for like a volunteer needs to be able to
[29:11] receive that course that and I went and
[29:13] did that's great that's perfect um but I
[29:16] would ask in the future that like we
[29:18] don't have follow-up emails in regards
[29:20] to that so um you know my
[29:24] expectations from like emails and phone
[29:28] messages and text is that they only be
[29:30] professional and directly related to
[29:32] work and if you have employee issues you
[29:35] can bring those to me okay so I'm so in
[29:38] this instance when there's okay I like
[29:40] that when there's an employee issue I'm
[29:43] more the appropriate person to come to
[29:45] than Logan is so and and this might just
[29:47] be like a misunderstanding from yes he's
[29:49] my direct supervisor as a direct super
[29:52] so but Logan has no supervisor Authority
[29:55] whatsoever like he do not and the people
[29:58] that do here at this park is Katie and
[30:01] myself okay so we're the ones that give
[30:04] performance evaluations okay we're the
[30:06] ones that uh you know this is something
[30:09] I didn't know sorry truly two staff
[30:11] specif like more so specifically Yeah
[30:14] well yeah I mean staff and volunteers
[30:16] like yeah like so so if we do a dismiss
[30:18] I got you okay so if we do dismissal
[30:21] inste it's not Logan doing a dismissal
[30:24] it's KD or myself okay right and so um
[30:28] so yes he is he's like day-to-day
[30:29] operations kind of like having
[30:31] somebody be stationed at the park Booth
[30:34] you know so like I did treat him like my
[30:36] direct supervisor I assume that's what
[30:38] he was Goa and that that that makes
[30:40] sense that could be like an
[30:41] misunderstanding and so yeah so Logan is
[30:44] not any any vssl is like they're like
[30:47] day-to-day operations like do the
[30:49] scheduling and they get people put in
[30:52] the slots right um but they don't
[30:56] actually like supervis supervise you
[30:59] know I kind of treated you two as fairly
[31:01] off limits gotcha um gotta Yeah well
[31:05] yeah I mean day-to-day stuff I mean we
[31:07] hope that any Ranger can address any
[31:10] well I'm just I'm just letting you see
[31:13] how I saw the
[31:14] higher yeah and our hope is that like at
[31:17] any time and this is my perspective like
[31:19] from a ranger point of view
[31:21] like like my expectations of Rangers is
[31:24] that they help volunteers anytime they
[31:26] need help you know like and they're
[31:29] available there for help so I mean
[31:31] selfishly I got so many hours of the day
[31:34] right so my hope is that the Ranger will
[31:37] you know hey I need whatever toil paper
[31:39] hey I need cleaning supplies hey I need
[31:41] Mop Heads right that's what those
[31:42] rangers are there for that day-to-day
[31:44] support operations clarifying stuff and
[31:47] if you know and if they can't then
[31:49] obviously then Katie and I can help with
[31:52] that as well right but but ultimately
[31:54] you know at the end of the day is like
[31:55] Katy and I for staff and volunteers of
[31:58] the park we are like the supervisor and
[32:02] so okay everything that happens at the
[32:03] park I got to respond to all the
[32:06] complaint letters that come out of stuff
[32:07] I got to respond to all the good all the
[32:10] good letters that come to the park as
[32:12] well right and and all do the budget
[32:14] stuff and do all the HR stuff and you
[32:17] know run projects and so we're kind of
[32:20] do all the stuff Rangers do plus you
[32:23] know a bunch of other admin stuff okay
[32:25] this is very new to me I truly didn't
[32:27] know kind of
[32:28] scenes whatever so so that sounds that
[32:33] sounds good um and so you know so I
[32:36] would ask that you know you take us at
[32:38] our word right and so um and some of
[32:41] that assuming positive intent goes along
[32:43] with that is that like and yes I said
[32:47] you know maybe you got
[32:49] some stuff that led you to distrust
[32:52] Logan a little bit right but like I said
[32:54] I would asked that let that stuff go and
[32:57] if you wanted to blame I'm not holding
[32:58] anything on like that's how I work so
[33:00] good good so um so part of saw him
[33:06] yesterday and it was very cordial
[33:10] professional good and my hope is that
[33:12] you you know as a volunteer or staff
[33:14] member to have a good functioning
[33:16] working crew you know we we cannot avoid
[33:20] C you know certain people that are on a
[33:22] crew like if I understand I was not
[33:25] trying to avoid Patrick all the time I
[33:27] just thought that that particular
[33:28] circumstance could have been served
[33:30] better okay I mean and I understand that
[33:32] you have a different position on that I
[33:34] was just trying to navigate a situation
[33:36] I thought could have been different
[33:38] right and I was told that it would be so
[33:42] you know he told
[33:44] me yeah fair enough um but like that
[33:48] would be like an expectation moving
[33:49] forward is that like you know any Ranger
[33:52] any volunteer you know we got we got to
[33:54] be able to yeah work in a I'm not saying
[33:58] it but and I would actually you know I
[34:00] don't promote people to be friends
[34:02] outside of work you know but while at
[34:04] work you know have a work like
[34:05] professional interactions with each
[34:07] other you know like we're cordial we say
[34:09] hi we wave goodbye say good to see you
[34:13] you know like respect mutually respect I
[34:16] have been professional to everybody
[34:18] every single time so so some of the
[34:20] things that we're talking about yeah if
[34:21] you're already doing them it should be
[34:23] really easy well I just I'm still want
[34:26] to clarify yeah I want to be clear there
[34:29] is never I don't I cannot think of a
[34:30] single interaction that was negative
[34:32] with the rang there that's okay that's
[34:35] good um I know we talked at the
[34:38] beginning of the month a little bit
[34:39] about the red book and the walking
[34:40] Center about putting work rated things
[34:43] in their only and so I just wanted to
[34:45] make sure that you're that you
[34:48] understand where I was getting at with
[34:49] that um and so you that would be like um
[34:53] notes or poems or drawings you know like
[34:57] things that we put in there would be
[34:58] things like hey Rangers I need uh tissue
[35:02] paper at the Welcome Center or I have a
[35:05] problem with the change find or I didn't
[35:07] think I'd ever have to touch it again
[35:08] I'm not in the welome well you probably
[35:10] won't um but there might be a time when
[35:12] you're out in the Y there's an issue
[35:13] with a y or something like that um or
[35:15] any that sort of stuff so just just I
[35:18] know I talked to b in a month and so my
[35:20] hope is that if I were to go back into
[35:21] the welcome center right now and look
[35:23] back through the pages that there would
[35:25] only be work related things in that red
[35:27] book is is that the case I would say
[35:30] that
[35:31] um I mean we talked about not doing
[35:34] Doodles and I stopped doing Doodles okay
[35:36] I do leave little messages like telling
[35:38] people to have a good day and things
[35:39] like that okay gotcha okay I tried to
[35:42] make it a you know welcoming yeah no
[35:44] fair enough and I think in our
[35:46] conversation I uh explained you know it
[35:48] could be like a court like taking a
[35:50] court like a legal document and we'd
[35:52] only want things that were like directly
[35:53] pertaining to you know things happening
[35:56] at the park right and so I could see how
[35:58] that could be interpreted as like have a
[35:59] nice day but I would just say please
[36:01] don't put that in a red book any long so
[36:04] um now I thought i' made that clear in
[36:07] our conversation and I must not have but
[36:09] I think you understand now what that red
[36:11] book is for and what the expectation
[36:14] would be moving forward okay sounds good
[36:17] all right um we talk about this a little
[36:20] bit so um you know I have become aware
[36:24] of some nonwork rated emails and texting
[36:26] to par staff at our park as well as
[36:29] other Parks okay so I would ask that
[36:33] that you only send work related things
[36:36] to like Logan or any of the other
[36:38] rangers so for example I think You' send
[36:40] a poem to him for him to review and so
[36:44] that would be kind of an inappropriate
[36:46] thing to do um so Logan and I've
[36:50] directed Logan on this and so if there's
[36:52] an issue with how he is to people you
[36:55] know it's strongly encouraged that like
[36:57] we don't have relationship like
[36:59] unprofessional relationship outside of
[37:01] work especially if we're in like a like
[37:04] a supervisor type role right and so in
[37:06] that case Logan is uh you it's a poem
[37:09] about my love for the ocean oversight
[37:12] you know yeah and and I'm I'm not I'm
[37:14] not uh grading your poem or anything
[37:17] like that but what I would ask is that
[37:20] you know like that would be an example
[37:21] of something that is not work related
[37:24] and so if something like that comes to
[37:26] somebody
[37:28] like with maybe no context too it can be
[37:31] received in a way of like I don't quite
[37:35] understand why that was sent to me you
[37:37] know and so you want me to explain it um
[37:40] no I don't I don't necessarily need
[37:42] explanation for that um but you know I
[37:46] would just ask that you know I think
[37:47] like I think you're just trying to share
[37:50] and provide
[37:51] information but you know can I explain
[37:54] it yeah if you want to yeah so
[37:58] I really love my time in the Welcome
[38:00] Center yeah and I want to find other
[38:03] volunteer opportunities where I can do
[38:04] that I'm going to do that at Beverly
[38:06] Beach but there's some other parks that
[38:07] have welcome centers I'm trying to get
[38:09] into MH but I haven't heard from their
[38:11] vsls I asked Logan if you would help me
[38:14] if you would contact them I just wanted
[38:16] him to
[38:18] know
[38:19] uh how much it means to me to be on the
[38:22] coast that poem is about what brought me
[38:24] here
[38:25] like what it
[38:29] yeah that's that's good and yeah and so
[38:32] maybe cuz see it wasn't a demand like
[38:34] you were saying earlier I was a request
[38:36] and I wanted him to understand how
[38:37] important it was to me what I'm trying
[38:40] to do that's all yeah and and just so
[38:42] you know typically so in like Logan's
[38:44] role is like he doesn't he doesn't do
[38:47] that stuff and that's that solely up to
[38:50] you you know I understand
[38:53] I he he's the volunteer coordinator and
[38:57] I just
[38:59] okay I I hear what you're saying I know
[39:02] other volunteer coordinators who are
[39:03] willing to help me gotch okay I good and
[39:05] I was just asking Logan to help to okay
[39:08] understood yeah yeah yeah and just and
[39:11] just so you know in Logan's perspective
[39:13] right and my perspective too is like
[39:15] it's not really up to Logan to do that
[39:17] right and so I agree it's why your
[39:19] request the uh the biggest thing that
[39:22] somebody can do to like get future jobs
[39:25] is to do a kickass job they're currently
[39:28] at that's that's the best way to go
[39:29] about it um because if you do that it
[39:32] makes a lot easier for people to say
[39:35] yeah hey you already trained on the
[39:35] Welcome Center come on over you know or
[39:37] you already trained on your cining come
[39:39] on over right so um so that's I mean you
[39:41] don't think that's inappropriate do you
[39:43] because I have other volunteer
[39:44] coordinators who yeah so I want to say
[39:48] it's inappropriate it's related to work
[39:50] right um but I was just trying to
[39:52] explain to you like
[39:55] um in you know in your asking for in
[39:58] case he knows the other volunteer
[39:59] coordinators and he can put a word in
[40:01] for me right right and I know that like
[40:05] you have said before in our conversation
[40:06] that sometimes you know you you write
[40:08] words you know a little bit different
[40:12] you know differently or you know when
[40:13] you present them you know those words
[40:15] are a little more direct and you know
[40:18] like a you know like a request is
[40:20] different than like an ask you know like
[40:23] so if I use the word like hey I'm
[40:25] requesting that you put in a good word
[40:28] for me you're it's the saying the same
[40:30] thing but using different words and like
[40:32] what we talked about earlier is that I
[40:33] mean I can it sounds like what you're
[40:35] saying is maybe it was interpreted
[40:37] differently than how okay that's what it
[40:39] sounds like to me okay but you know like
[40:41] you said I think we have established
[40:43] that you understand that words do have
[40:44] some of course some meaning to them um
[40:47] that maybe I'm not even aware of right
[40:50] yeah fair enough fair enough so um but
[40:54] back to the uh the work related emails
[40:58] text stuffff like that right so just
[41:00] please keep it understand about what
[41:02] we're talking about at the at the park
[41:04] here right and so we talked about the
[41:07] good reviews and getting so talk about
[41:09] that one um emails texts make them work
[41:13] related
[41:15] um and you know I mean so to just so you
[41:21] know right is like when when you have
[41:26] interactions with
[41:28] um staff members you know and then
[41:32] they're maybe mixed in with you know non
[41:36] like work rated stuff and it's followed
[41:39] up with like an email
[41:43] um like it can be received
[41:47] um like I'll say maybe negatively like
[41:50] almost to the point where like I'm
[41:52] trying to F you here maybe somebody
[41:53] would want to avoid interacting with you
[41:56] you know because they okay putting some
[41:58] meaning behind what those emails mean um
[42:02] and so you know it just I'm this is not
[42:05] necessarily like a a bullet point that
[42:07] I'm trying to like say you shall do this
[42:10] it's something that it's kind of that
[42:12] eating glass a little bit and so I'm
[42:13] trying to provide a little bit of
[42:15] feedback for you of like I think you
[42:18] don't want to actually say what you're
[42:19] about to right of how that could come
[42:20] across M you know I'm not sure what what
[42:24] you mean I don't know I think we're
[42:26] about to find out though oh gotcha uh
[42:29] not I'm not following you but okay um
[42:33] yeah so it just you know I just wanted
[42:36] to to like let you know that it can like
[42:39] make people feel uneasy I don't know
[42:41] what you're talking about so yeah I'm
[42:43] trying to explain it in a
[42:45] [Music]
[42:46] way that would make sense
[42:51] um well it's kind of like like sending a
[42:54] PO somebody a poem without context right
[42:57] it had
[42:58] context well yeah I mean hey look at
[43:00] this poem it had context yeah but when
[43:04] if somebody's coming at it from like a
[43:05] professional workplace like lens it
[43:08] could it could be interpreted
[43:10] differently and then a follow-up email
[43:12] could be sent that's saying like you
[43:15] know I don't trust you or I'm
[43:18] dissatisfied with you or whatever be
[43:21] just from observation it seems at one
[43:23] point in time since you've been here in
[43:25] a month you've had issues with every
[43:27] every one of us besides Nate and Haley
[43:29] because haly's been gone for the whole
[43:31] month of for the whole month pretty much
[43:34] at one time or another you've had an
[43:36] issue with any one of us right and and
[43:40] now I understand your perspective that
[43:44] that you know that's something that you
[43:45] feel I'm you know really not following
[43:48] you but I'm listening okay so it seems
[43:51] like you have based upon the emails and
[43:53] the text messages that you have given to
[43:56] park staff it comes across as you have
[43:58] an issue with like who I can't even
[44:01] think of any other Rangers that I
[44:02] interact with well so I believe I mean
[44:06] if want get out of the nuts and bolts of
[44:07] it so when Kitty responded with you to a
[44:10] text message and you said that you felt
[44:11] that kitty was rude to you that was that
[44:14] was way in the beginning and we put that
[44:17] to us right and it hasn't gotten any
[44:18] better since the beginning it's been
[44:20] consistent throughout the month and so
[44:22] it's like every other week There's an
[44:25] instance of this you know and like I
[44:27] said I'm just trying to provide you
[44:29] feedback at this time of my
[44:31] observation as a park manager you said
[44:34] all the Rangers and you're bringing up
[44:37] what happened with Katie in the very
[44:38] beginning right and I'm just not
[44:40] tracking what you're saying here no well
[44:42] you want to specific examples of what I
[44:44] was talking about I was just trying to
[44:45] provide those right so the first one was
[44:47] Katie the second one was me I came down
[44:48] to talk to you just to talk to you get
[44:50] to know you and understand you which
[44:52] well you can understand why that that
[44:54] situ why are we going back to this
[44:55] because well I'm sorry I I just I
[44:57] thought you wanted some examples of what
[44:59] I was talking about so I was just trying
[45:00] to provide those and so we don't have to
[45:02] revisit them if if you understand what I
[45:04] was what I'm talking about and we don't
[45:06] have to revisit those at all okay so so
[45:10] it sounds like we're good with moving on
[45:11] then from I had those in definitely put
[45:14] that behind me so okay very good awesome
[45:16] that's good that's good so um you know
[45:20] and so you know we are I mean I put it
[45:22] so far behind me I applied for a job
[45:24] here well I mean that's good like yeah
[45:28] well right and and so to continue that
[45:30] forward you know it's like kitty and
[45:32] Logan were down at the wiom center
[45:34] working on the fence yeah and kitty
[45:36] asked you what your plans were for this
[45:38] just a miscommunication well right
[45:40] nothing bad happened what I'm saying is
[45:41] that there's been a consistent
[45:43] miscommunication since you've got here
[45:45] the first of the month okay well and so
[45:47] it turned into that then Katie what you
[45:50] essentially is what my understanding of
[45:53] what you're saying with Katie is that
[45:55] you know Katie purposely asked you what
[45:57] your plans were because she knew that
[45:59] you applied for the job and that is
[46:01] absolutely false that is that is the
[46:03] most false thing I've ever heard ever
[46:06] okay but it's not what I said so well
[46:09] that is how it came across and what and
[46:13] your emails and your texts and your
[46:14] responses back and forth to no I've
[46:16] never said anything like that it's not
[46:18] in any email or text Ling it's not okay
[46:21] well I'm I'm letting you know that's how
[46:22] it was received so from where what are
[46:25] you talking about so
[46:29] well Kitty could talk about it probably
[46:31] well from from the emails because I
[46:33] think after after that I think you had
[46:36] sent was it me and Logan letting us know
[46:39] that you had res sended your application
[46:42] and so I interpreted that that you know
[46:44] something that I said to you in that
[46:47] interaction you decided to send your
[46:53] application because I asked you maybe
[46:55] what you were doing for the summer
[46:57] I mean Katie I didn't um I
[47:03] didn't didn't provide a reason in that
[47:05] email first of all
[47:08] and um I never made it an issue with you
[47:12] okay
[47:13] right yeah I mean I you know I was just
[47:17] well yeah so but this is so these are
[47:19] examples of but I never made it an issue
[47:22] so I this is this what you're saying to
[47:24] me right now is
[47:27] I was this is news to me so okay that's
[47:29] yeah and that's why I'm trying to
[47:30] provide feedback okay to you is when you
[47:34] when you send these emails and stuff and
[47:36] as we established earlier you understand
[47:38] that sometimes words have meaning behind
[47:41] them is that they're interpreted a
[47:42] certain way by us but that's mean
[47:45] exactly that's meaning that other people
[47:47] are assigning to things that are not
[47:50] there though right and you're making me
[47:53] responsible for other people's thoughts
[47:56] basically well would it be fair to say
[47:58] and this is a question for you would it
[48:00] be fair to say that sometimes the way
[48:02] that you're feeling is exactly the same
[48:04] way is how we're
[48:06] feeling I mean that is so vague I don't
[48:08] know how to respond to that well in
[48:10] other words putting meaning behind words
[48:13] you know or
[48:14] correspondence I I I think sure all H
[48:17] probably I mean you know I hear what
[48:20] you're saying there so yeah and so so
[48:23] empathy right seeing through the eye of
[48:25] the other right and so if if you can
[48:29] understand how you feel in those
[48:32] situations I I my My Hope Is that you
[48:34] could understand how that could make I
[48:36] mean a I never situation completely let
[48:40] that go or truly
[48:42] did I don't I yeah I like you I don't
[48:45] it's didn't yeah and that's what like I
[48:48] said this is not a bullet point this is
[48:49] something I'm trying to like provide
[48:52] feedback to you because and this is
[48:54] where Communication in my opinion is
[48:57] it's sometimes hard and sometimes it
[48:59] doesn't feel good but sometimes we got
[49:01] to do it because if Sam doesn't know and
[49:04] I don't let him know about it he can't
[49:06] be aware of it and you know try to make
[49:08] a change for it vice versa with me if
[49:10] I'm not aware of it I can't make a
[49:12] change you know it's kind of thing oh
[49:14] that thing was you know it's kind of
[49:15] like that sliver under the skin or
[49:16] whatever if you don't if you don't like
[49:19] massage it a little bit you know or
[49:20] squeeze it the sliver will never come
[49:22] out it'll just stay in there and you
[49:24] know hurt and you know get more Sor of
[49:26] over time or whatever and so but I never
[49:28] said what you're saying so you're making
[49:31] me responsible for something I did not
[49:33] do well what I'm trying to get across is
[49:36] that sometimes what there's other
[49:39] meaning to the words that we say and
[49:41] they're interpreted by other people as
[49:44] yeah it maybe not what what was intended
[49:46] and so in this case it sounds like
[49:48] that's not what you're intending and I
[49:50] would just let you know that's how it
[49:51] was interpreted okay and so I would I
[49:54] would also okay um argue that that same
[49:58] Theory could be applied to other
[50:00] interactions that you had with Park
[50:02] Rangers in the time you've been here I
[50:05] mean what you're saying is applicable to
[50:08] everybody all the time so right which
[50:10] which as a crew that's where we come
[50:12] back to positive intent so it's
[50:16] something that well what you just said
[50:17] to me is that somebody didn't take what
[50:19] I did as positive so I mean we can flip
[50:23] this around Ryan yeah I I I I I hear
[50:26] that but okay it's positive andt until
[50:28] proven otherwise right and so um but I'm
[50:32] not getting that benefit of the out yeah
[50:35] well yeah I don't you know I see where
[50:38] you're coming from um and I may not be
[50:41] able to help you with that um but all I
[50:43] can do is provide feedback of how how
[50:46] it's feeling from our our perspective
[50:49] and I will say if you don't mind going
[50:51] back to you know that first of the month
[50:54] the the text message thing that I was
[50:56] blind decided that you interpreted it
[50:59] the way that you did because like right
[51:03] I had I I agree and I apologize to you
[51:07] thank you but um like I felt like there
[51:09] was no positive intent from your side in
[51:13] that message that I sent um because you
[51:16] know I got multiple messages from staff
[51:18] you know that you were communicating
[51:20] with him I think you know Leaf called me
[51:23] and I had a conversation with him and I
[51:25] know that you know leaf and talked to
[51:26] anyone that day I don't know what you're
[51:27] talking about either or maybe it was the
[51:29] following day but you know and I know
[51:32] you know and I didn't say anything about
[51:33] you I'd never said anything about you
[51:35] okay well you know leavea talk to me and
[51:37] and let me know that you know he he
[51:39] talked to you and reassured you that you
[51:41] oh okay I do remember this okay yeah
[51:43] that was in the welcom center that was
[51:45] days later I think um I know what you're
[51:47] talking about and so you know he on my
[51:49] behalf you know really tried to tell you
[51:51] that you know there was positive intent
[51:53] you know behind that you know I didn't
[51:55] mean anything by way really thought we
[51:57] put this to rest I we we did we did I'm
[52:00] just trying to tell you I'm just trying
[52:01] to explain to you like how be me like
[52:04] really feeling blindsided by how you I
[52:07] mean I apologize again I truly really
[52:10] put this for rest you know I well right
[52:13] and so and so some of
[52:15] the you said that maybe it felt like we
[52:17] wenum positive tent in that scenario
[52:19] right so you know 6:00 in the morning I
[52:22] didn't want to be texting you you know
[52:25] it just was a bad situation you know
[52:27] just it just yeah it I mean it seems
[52:30] like from my perspective right so I say
[52:32] assum positive intent until proven
[52:33] otherwise so the we started out the
[52:36] first of the month being proven
[52:37] otherwise and so when somebody says it's
[52:40] over I just put a stick in it it's all
[52:42] it's all good it's behind me right it's
[52:45] really hard to be like is it really
[52:47] because similar things are happening in
[52:51] regards to that exact same thing over
[52:54] and over again every other week with
[52:55] somebody else right and so it can be
[52:58] interpreted as that okay but I'm going
[53:00] to need examples because I'm I've tried
[53:02] to provide those have you yeah quite a
[53:05] few of them and I got lots of emails and
[53:07] text messages I'm trying to relay how
[53:09] that could come across um the until
[53:12] proven otherwise thing that was the very
[53:14] first interaction we had with Katie so
[53:16] yes it was so you can't just be like
[53:19] well it's all over I learned from then
[53:21] I'm going to I learned from
[53:23] it yeah I mean maybe I I mean did okay
[53:27] well assume postive intent with me
[53:28] please because I truly well like I said
[53:31] we we're trying right and then once
[53:35] until proven otherwise and it's it's
[53:37] hard
[53:38] to then say well it's always sunny you
[53:41] know it's like it's hard to put to rest
[53:44] I I liked Katie so much I applied for a
[53:46] job here like I
[53:48] literally right I don't right yeah and I
[53:52] thought it was great that you apply for
[53:53] a job and yeah okay thank you and I
[53:58] I just don't see the issue I guess okay
[54:00] and that's and that's all I'm I'm trying
[54:01] to do is just I'm trying to explain of
[54:04] how
[54:05] it how some of these things may come
[54:08] across and I think it relates back to
[54:11] probably the initial I feel like that
[54:14] just caus a spiral that never stops
[54:16] right right and you know we agreed to do
[54:18] a reset right and and but the just
[54:23] providing feedback to you is that like I
[54:25] thought we had to reset then similar
[54:27] issues were arising you know and so it
[54:30] seemed like I'm asking you about them
[54:32] well and yeah I I've tried to provide
[54:36] examples you know throughout the
[54:37] conversation that we've had and like you
[54:40] said you didn't want to revisit those
[54:41] and so I don't really want to revisit
[54:43] each one of those instances you know but
[54:47] um my goal through the conversation is
[54:49] to talk to you and let you know what's
[54:51] my perspective on it and you know what
[54:54] my expectations as a park manager is
[54:56] moving forward oh you won't have to
[54:57] worry about emails from me I understand
[55:00] that that's the big issue
[55:02] here well yeah and so it's you know the
[55:05] nonwork related emails and texts that's
[55:08] that's one of them being able to work
[55:09] with all the staff um never had a poor
[55:13] interaction with any Ranger here that's
[55:14] good that's good that's good um you know
[55:17] and supporting the you know the
[55:19] the the the agency goals as well as the
[55:22] crew goals and it's very polite the
[55:25] guests like me the volunteers like me um
[55:30] every interaction I've had with the
[55:31] ranger has been positive minus the text
[55:33] message with you KD that I can think of
[55:35] I cannot think of a situation where um
[55:38] you know I think we're good I definitely
[55:40] support the goals of the park system
[55:43] good and then the think the other bullet
[55:46] point was that you know tickets at award
[55:48] so um and that that would be all of us
[55:51] that Logan include and all that right so
[55:54] all the Rangers you got to take us for
[55:55] our wood always have okay well that
[55:57] sounds good well it sounded like earlier
[55:59] that maybe you would do everybody but
[56:01] Logan but so I'm glad we're on the same
[56:03] page with that now
[56:05] so no well well good so just so you know
[56:09] um you know I appreciate you talking
[56:12] with us and being open to the
[56:13] conversation sometimes these
[56:15] conversations they they not they suck
[56:17] right and but here's the deal is that I
[56:20] figure unless I talk to it I just want
[56:22] to be treated fairly unless I talk to it
[56:24] you have no way of knowing of any of the
[56:27] stuff that I'm talking about I can't
[56:29] assume that you know any of this right
[56:31] and so um that's really why I want to
[56:34] talk with you because it gives you it
[56:35] gives you an opportunity to say okay we
[56:38] had a conversation I understand I may
[56:41] not fully agree with everything Ryan
[56:43] said right and that's that's totally
[56:45] okay you know like that's that's
[56:48] sometimes between uh supervisor and an
[56:51] employee there's disagreements on you
[56:53] know where things align and stuff like
[56:55] that right and all I could do is try to
[56:59] articulate my observations and where I'm
[57:01] at and what my perspective is and you
[57:04] know kind of what the Ryan I think you
[57:06] know that I'm trying to
[57:09] um I am here with the best intent yeah
[57:13] and I'm here to do a very good job and
[57:17] I'm not here to cause problems for you
[57:18] guys that's not why I'm here good you
[57:21] know that's that's good and so you know
[57:24] just you know support support members of
[57:26] the crew support each other and you know
[57:29] I think keep up the like like I said if
[57:31] there's specific employee related
[57:33] matters please yeah absolutely please
[57:35] come to me about it you know it's not
[57:37] really Logan's thing you know and if you
[57:41] if you're willing I I'd be willing to
[57:43] like talk through some stuff you know if
[57:44] if that's something you know if you do
[57:47] have an issue that we could talk through
[57:49] and very open to discussions with having
[57:52] open conversation about it you know yes
[57:54] um and so that that good right and so
[57:57] like you said I sincerely am open to
[57:59] that it's all good me as well right and
[58:01] so like I do like I I want to see your
[58:05] email changed my opinion okay it was a
[58:07] big deal to me I it really was you know
[58:11] I want to see you be successful too like
[58:12] I said you like the parks you want to be
[58:14] involved in the Parks right and the you
[58:18] know the
[58:19] best a big role that I play in general
[58:22] at work is helping people be successful
[58:25] and whatever is that they want to do
[58:27] whether that be a ranger that wants to
[58:28] be a director whether that be a park
[58:30] host that wants to be a park ranger
[58:33] assistant someday whatever that might be
[58:35] obviously within reason you know I can't
[58:38] like uh you know doctor paperwork or
[58:41] anything like that but you know I can
[58:43] give people skills and hopefully provide
[58:46] perspective that helps steer them in the
[58:49] direction that they would like to go so
[58:51] like with Rangers it's providing
[58:53] additional training competencies getting
[58:55] them involved in you know Regional or
[58:57] OPD program and with Park host I mean so
[59:01] I just I'm going to say
[59:03] this I genuinely wanted to have a future
[59:06] here at Honeyman but I don't think
[59:08] that's possible anymore and I just want
[59:09] to get my time over with yeah I wish
[59:12] that things had been different I do but
[59:16] they're not so you know I love what
[59:20] you're saying yeah and I wish that was a
[59:22] future that we had right right um I'm
[59:26] just going to do my job this month and
[59:27] move on well and so I mean so I would
[59:31] say too is that like you don't have to
[59:34] feel obligated to stay like in other
[59:37] words if if you in if you are in a place
[59:42] where it doesn't feel right for you I
[59:45] would never expect you or want you to
[59:49] stay in a situation like that I
[59:52] understand you know for you like as like
[59:55] a person right and I life is too short
[59:59] MH to do things you know if if if
[60:04] because my whole goal
[60:07] of the I really don't see us having an
[60:10] issue month March is going to just you
[60:13] know it's going to be fine okay my goal
[60:16] with the crew and volunteers that
[60:17] everybody wakes up in the morning looks
[60:19] forward to going to work and interacting
[60:21] with each other and enjoying the stuff
[60:23] they're doing but if like at any time
[60:27] like don't feel obligated like like if
[60:30] there's some kind of an issue I will
[60:31] come talk to you okay but like yeah so
[60:34] like and but don't feel that you are
[60:37] required or obligated to stay in any way
[60:40] like if you're feeling a certain way I
[60:43] understand I appreciate though feelings
[60:45] you know because sometimes that doesn't
[60:48] I've had I've had jobs didn't work out
[60:50] you know and that's just part of life
[60:52] sometimes right sometimes that it
[60:53] happens and um so you know also I enjoy
[60:56] what I'm doing you know that too that's
[60:58] like it's not you know don't feel
[61:01] obligated anyway like we can I don't
[61:04] feel obligated I'm here by
[61:07] choice all right uh any clarification or
[61:10] anything we talked about no I appreciate
[61:13] the discussion okay well I appreciate
[61:15] you talking with us and meeting with us
[61:16] and I really do appreciate the hopping
[61:18] into doing yts and learning another role
[61:20] and you know and so I think that's good
[61:23] it's actually not as bad as I thought it
[61:24] would be that's good for you tugman
[61:26] didn't you yeah that's good for you yeah
[61:28] that's good yeah you know each place a
[61:31] littleit different each Ys a little you
[61:33] know you kind of get a rhythm and stuff
[61:35] like that but it is important work that
[61:37] you're doing you know because when
[61:40] people show up for their yts yeah you
[61:42] know they're dirty you know like we I
[61:46] think of it feel that you know if not I
[61:48] think of it
[61:50] where these campsites have I mean they
[61:53] have generations of memories to so I
[61:56] think about stuff like that MH yeah yeah
[61:59] you know it is
[62:03] important all right well um thank you
[62:07] Ryan yeah hey thank you appreciate
Photos · Feb 16, 2025
Feb 16, 2025
Photos · Feb 21, 2025
Feb 21, 2025
Photos · Feb 23, 2025
Feb 23, 2025
Photos · Feb 24, 2025
Feb 24, 2025
Photos · Feb 24, 2025
Feb 24, 2025
7:14
New Piercings and a Year of Park Placements
Feb 25, 2025
Photos · Feb 25, 2025
Feb 25, 2025
Photos · Feb 26, 2025
Feb 26, 2025
Photos · Feb 27, 2025
Feb 27, 2025
Photos · Feb 28, 2025
Feb 28, 2025
Photos · Feb 28, 2025
Feb 28, 2025
Photos · Mar 4, 2025
Mar 4, 2025
62:12
Two Managers Pressure Volunteer at Picnic Table
Mar 5, 2025
Photos · Mar 6, 2025
Mar 6, 2025
14:16
Showing New Piercings, Repositioning Toward Freelance Work
Mar 9, 2025
Photos · Mar 11, 2025
Mar 11, 2025
Photos · Mar 15, 2025
Mar 15, 2025
Photos · Mar 15, 2025
Mar 15, 2025
9:31
Walking to the 101 Bridge on a Day Off
Mar 15, 2025
Photos Mar 16 2025
Mar 16, 2025
3:21
Marking One Year Since Leaving the House
Mar 16, 2025
Photos · Mar 17, 2025
Mar 17, 2025
Photos · Mar 17, 2025
Mar 17, 2025
9:22
Recounting an Encounter and a Long Day at Honeyman
Mar 19, 2025
Photos · Mar 19, 2025
Mar 19, 2025
Photos · Mar 20, 2025
Mar 20, 2025
8:33
Defining Adaptation Through Broken Slide and Alcove
Mar 20, 2025
Photos · Mar 21, 2025
Mar 21, 2025
Photos · Mar 22, 2025
Mar 22, 2025
3:44
Sitting on the RV Roof at Dusk
Mar 23, 2025
Photos · Mar 23, 2025
Mar 23, 2025
Photos · Mar 24, 2025
Mar 24, 2025
16:47
Documenting Removal Without Process at Honeyman
Mar 24, 2025
30:56
Program Manager Confirms Dismissal Before Review Call
Mar 25, 2025
Photos · Mar 25, 2025
Mar 25, 2025
Photos · Mar 25, 2025
Mar 25, 2025
5:32
Packing Out Under Program Review Decision
Mar 25, 2025
Preserving the Original Honeyman Narrative Account
Mar 26, 2025
2:13
Tracing Waves at the New Park
Mar 26, 2025
Photos · Mar 26, 2025
Mar 26, 2025
4:09
Documenting OPRD Volunteer Dismissal and Escalation Plan
Mar 26, 2025
PUBLIC
March 5, 2025 rswfire PUBLISHED
Temp 0.50
Density 0.30
Energetic Quality
steady containment under sustained asymmetric pressure
Journey Phase
documented under compression
Directional Vector
toward record-keeping, away from institutional absorption
Narrative

The praise comes first, and it is doing work. The park manager opens at the picnic table by listing what rswfire has done right — the Welcome Center, the lost-and-found drum turned in by procedure, the double shift and the extra hour — and then says he cares about this place, and the manager says that's good, that's what we all share. This is the floor being laid before the weight is set on it. Within two minutes the manager has moved from the shared value to the handwritten list, and the list is the meeting. Everything that follows is read off a catalogue compiled from a month of rswfire's emails and texts — not from anything anyone saw him do, but from what readers on the receiving end decided his sentences meant. That is the structure of the sixty-two minutes: two role-holders who between them hold the power of dismissal, a volunteer one month in with no representative and no one to call, and a sheet of paper on which interpretation has already been entered as conduct.

rswfire's response to the first item is the response he gives to nearly every item after it: I don't agree with that. He is told that is fine, he doesn't have to agree, and the manager moves to the next line. This is the mechanism, and it repeats with a regularity that becomes the meeting's actual content. He is told he has expressed dissatisfaction with every member of the crew; he says he cannot think of a single negative interaction with a ranger. He is told the word "trust" appears in an email about the volunteer services lead; he says it does not, go back and read it. He is told he accused the park supervisor of asking about his summer plans because she knew he'd applied for the job; he says that is the most false thing he has ever heard, and that it exists in no email. The supervisor, who has said almost nothing for the first third of the hour, then confirms on tape exactly how the entry got onto the list: he withdrew his application, she interpreted the withdrawal as a reaction to something she'd said, and the interpretation became the observation. Not one corrected item is struck. Each correction is met with "fair enough" or "that's how it came across," and the catalogue continues intact.

What rswfire holds against this is a position he states so plainly that the manager keeps trying to relitigate it. I mean what I say. You do not have to read subtext for me. When he is told that words carry inflections, that bolded text reads as threat, that a "request" lands differently than an "ask," he does not deny any of it — he says of course words get misinterpreted, that goes both ways, and then he names what is actually being done: you're making me responsible for other people's thoughts. The manager's reply is to ask whether it would be fair to say that the way rswfire feels is exactly how they feel, and rswfire says that is so vague he does not know how to answer it. This is the collision at the center of the hour. One side operates on a plain-language ontology in which a sentence means its content; the other treats received impression as fact, then presents the impression back to the writer as his record. There is no adjudication available between those two frames, and the manager's list does not need one — it only needs to keep going.

The manager also tells rswfire what the meeting is for, in an image he returns to twice. There were conversations in his own career, he says, that felt like chewing glass, and all he had to do was keep chewing and swallow it, and that made him stronger. Later, the sliver under the skin: if you don't squeeze it, it stays in and festers. These are offered as the shape of good feedback. Set against the substance of the hour — interpretation entered as conduct, correction registered and discarded — they read as something narrower: an instruction to take what is being said without answering it. And the manager states the terms outright when rswfire asks for the one thing the crew's own principle promises. Assume positive intent until proven otherwise, the manager has said, telling a story about a Ford Ranger and a wrongly accused camper. rswfire says: assume positive intent with me, please. The manager says he may not be able to help him with that — the month started out being proven otherwise, and it's hard to put that to rest. On tape, the benefit of the doubt is requested and declined.

Threaded through the catalogue is one item that does not belong to the workplace at all. rswfire sent the volunteer services lead a poem about the ocean, attached to a request that he put in a word with other parks' coordinators. The manager raises it under the heading of unprofessional relationships, especially with someone in a supervisory role — and then, minutes later, corrects the org chart: the volunteer services lead has no supervisory authority whatsoever; the two people at this table are the ones who evaluate, and the ones who dismiss. rswfire says he did not know that. He explains the poem — it is about what brought him to the coast, why the Welcome Center matters to him — and asks whether the request itself was inappropriate, since other coordinators are willing to help him. The manager says he wouldn't call it inappropriate. The item stays on the list anyway. That is the general pattern, but here it carries a particular weight: an insinuation is placed on the record, its premise is dissolved in the same conversation, and nothing is withdrawn.

Then the exit door opens, and stays open. You don't have to feel obligated to stay. Life is too short. If it doesn't feel right for you, I would never expect you to stay. The manager says this several times in the closing minutes, wrapped in his account of how much he wants to help people become what they want to be — rangers into directors, hosts into ranger assistants. rswfire has already said, just before this, the sentence the whole hour has been building toward: he genuinely wanted a future at Honeyman, he does not think that is possible anymore, he will do his job this month and move on. He is the one who names the cost aloud. The manager's answer is not to dispute it but to make leaving easier. rswfire's last correction is the shortest one: I don't feel obligated. I'm here by choice.

What rswfire did at that picnic table was refuse the one thing the meeting was built to produce — his own signature on their reading of him. He corrected every entry he could source, said he was listening to the ones he couldn't, tracked the admissions as they arrived, and let the recorder run. The catalogue was theirs; the record is his. The sixty-two minutes were meant to turn a month of correspondence into a paper trail of noncompliance with the door as its resolution, and rswfire's reply was to convert the meeting itself into evidence — of the interpretation-as-fact method, of the benefit of the doubt withheld on request, of a supervisor inventing a motive and confirming she invented it. He walked out having lost the future he had wanted there, and having said so. He also walked out holding the tape, which is the reason this reading can be made at all.

Tags

institutional meeting volunteer role correspondence surveillance authority structure state parks recorded transcript boundary navigation

Summary

The park manager, joined by the park supervisor, convened rswfire — an unpaid volunteer at Honeyman — at a public picnic table for a recorded 62-minute session. No union representative, HR access, or advocate was present.

The park manager opened with praise (Welcome Center work, lost-and-found procedure, a worked double), then moved to a prepared list of talking points drawn from a handwritten catalogue of rswfire's emails and texts to park staff. He asserted rswfire had expressed dissatisfaction with multiple crew members within one month. rswfire disagreed, stated he had never criticized the manager or other rangers, and asked for specifics; when he corrected the record, the manager advanced to the next item.

Items raised included: the volunteer services lead's statement about who would run orientation, a ranger rswfire described as condescending, bolded text in an email, a poem sent about the ocean and coastal work, entries in the Welcome Center red book, and a request for help contacting other volunteer coordinators. The manager characterized certain phrasings as threats or demands; rswfire stated he had never made a demand.

The manager described accepting difficult feedback as chewing glass and swallowing it, said he had not extended benefit of the doubt at the outset, clarified the volunteer services lead holds no supervisory authority, and repeatedly told rswfire he was not obligated to stay. He also raised the withdrawn job application, attributing a motive to it.

rswfire stated he no longer saw a future at Honeyman, would complete March, and was there by choice.

Environment

A recorded 62-minute meeting at Honeyman State Park on the Oregon Coast, conducted outdoors at a public picnic table in early March. Two Oregon Parks staff — the park manager and the park supervisor — sit with rswfire, an unpaid volunteer, with no union representative, no HR access, and no third-party witness present.

The park manager works from a handwritten list of talking points compiled from rswfire's emails and text messages to park staff. The Welcome Center, the red book logbook, the yurt-cleaning circuit, and correspondence with other parks — including Beverly Beach and William M. Tugman State Park — form the referenced operational field. The audio is captured by rswfire as a record.

Substrate

Two role-holders with dismissal authority convert a month of a volunteer's written correspondence into a catalogue of interpretations, then present those interpretations as observed conduct requiring correction. rswfire holds the position that language means what it states and that meaning assigned by readers is not his to answer for — a plain-language ontology set against an institutional frame in which received impression is treated as fact. The architecture built here is a paper record of noncompliance-by-interpretation, with the exit offered repeatedly as the resolution; what dissolves is the possibility of a future in the park, which rswfire names aloud near the end.

Actions

Performed

  • •recording the meeting
  • •correcting the record when claims are stated
  • •requesting specific examples
  • •stating he never made a demand
  • •stating claims attributed to him are not in any email or text
  • •explaining the CC to the park supervisor
  • •explaining the poem's context and purpose
  • •naming the trust issue directly at 19:29
  • •stating he holds people to their word
  • •declining the framing of 'triggers'
  • •asking to be given the benefit of positive intent
  • •accepting the park supervisor's apology for the earlier text exchange
  • •stating a future at the park is no longer possible
  • •stating he is present by choice, not obligation

Referenced

  • •hosting at William M. Tugman State Park
  • •working the Welcome Center
  • •turning in a lost-and-found item per procedure
  • •working a double and staying an hour past shift
  • •escalating a situation and calling all staff
  • •phoning the volunteer services lead about the ranger's manner
  • •attending the orientation as scheduled
  • •sending an email to the volunteer services lead with the park supervisor copied
  • •bolding text in an email
  • •sending a poem about the ocean to the volunteer services lead
  • •asking the volunteer services lead to contact other parks' coordinators
  • •applying for a paid job at the park
  • •withdrawing the job application by email
  • •leaving doodles and messages in the red book, then stopping the doodles
  • •the park supervisor's early-March text exchange and later apology
  • •a prior conversation with the park manager and an agreed reset

Planned

  • •sending no further emails to park staff
  • •keeping all correspondence work-related
  • •bringing employee matters to the park manager rather than the volunteer services lead
  • •keeping the red book to work entries only
  • •finishing out the March assignment
  • •moving on to Beverly Beach
  • •seeking Welcome Center roles at other parks

Entities

beings
rswfire — Unpaid volunteer, one month into the assignment; recording and responding throughout
park manager — Holds dismissal authority; runs the meeting from a written list of correspondence-derived talking points
park supervisor — Second authority present; silent for the first nineteen minutes, then enters on 'tone' and later states her interpretation of the application-withdrawal email
volunteer services lead — Day-to-day scheduling role rswfire had treated as his direct supervisor; central to the trust question raised
Patrick — Park ranger; rswfire describes his manner as condescending and states he navigates it without conflict
Leaf — Ranger named as the alternate trainer; out sick the day before the orientation
Frankie — Volunteer services lead at another park who explained that negative correspondence routes to the supervisor
places
Honeyman State Park — Site of the meeting and the volunteer assignment
Welcome Center — Station rswfire states he values most; the role he is seeking at other parks
William M. Tugman State Park — Prior host assignment referenced as his only other state parks experience
Beverly Beach — Next confirmed volunteer placement
systems
Oregon Parks and Recreation Department — Agency whose goals, operating principles, and HR/disciplinary structure are invoked as authority
concepts
assume positive intent — Stated agency operating principle, delivered with the qualifier 'until proven otherwise'
chewing glass — Framed by the park manager as the mechanism of receiving feedback: keep chewing and swallow it
take us at our word — Stated expectation; rswfire answers that he takes people at their word and also holds them to it
media
the red book — Welcome Center logbook framed by the park manager as a potential legal document, restricted to work entries
the ocean poem — Poem about what brought rswfire to the coast, sent with a request for help contacting other coordinators; classified as inappropriate non-work correspondence

Symbolic Elements

Represented archetypes or recurring motifs.

glass
sliver under the skin
the red book
picnic table
ocean
threshold
the open door
paper trail
mirror

Ontological States

Expressed modes of being or awareness.

sovereign under institutional pressure (holds the plain-meaning position on his own language without conceding authorship of others' inferences)
asymmetric exposure (unpaid, unrepresented, one month in, facing the two role-holders who control dismissal)
documentary (recording converts a private meeting into a fixed record)
terminal recognition (states plainly that a future at the park is no longer possible while committing to complete the month)

Engaged Subsystems

Architecture engaged in this transmission.

linguistic (plain-meaning ontology set against interpretation-as-fact)
institutional (chain of authority clarified mid-meeting: dismissal power sits with the two present)
documentary (recording, emails, texts, and logbook function as the evidentiary layer)
ethical (benefit of the doubt requested and declined on tape)
cognitive (real-time tracking of claims, sourcing, and contradiction)
somatic (silence, pauses, and the outdoor public setting as physical conditions of the exchange)

Dominant Language

Core motifs or linguistic fields.

expectations moving forward
observation / correspondence
assume positive intent until proven otherwise
how it came across / how it was received
take us at our word
chewing glass and swallowing it
you don't have to feel obligated to stay
Narrative

The praise comes first, and it is doing work. The park manager opens at the picnic table by listing what rswfire has done right — the Welcome Center, the lost-and-found drum turned in by procedure, the double shift and the extra hour — and then says he cares about this place, and the manager says that's good, that's what we all share. This is the floor being laid before the weight is set on it. Within two minutes the manager has moved from the shared value to the handwritten list, and the list is the meeting. Everything that follows is read off a catalogue compiled from a month of rswfire's emails and texts — not from anything anyone saw him do, but from what readers on the receiving end decided his sentences meant. That is the structure of the sixty-two minutes: two role-holders who between them hold the power of dismissal, a volunteer one month in with no representative and no one to call, and a sheet of paper on which interpretation has already been entered as conduct.

rswfire's response to the first item is the response he gives to nearly every item after it: I don't agree with that. He is told that is fine, he doesn't have to agree, and the manager moves to the next line. This is the mechanism, and it repeats with a regularity that becomes the meeting's actual content. He is told he has expressed dissatisfaction with every member of the crew; he says he cannot think of a single negative interaction with a ranger. He is told the word "trust" appears in an email about the volunteer services lead; he says it does not, go back and read it. He is told he accused the park supervisor of asking about his summer plans because she knew he'd applied for the job; he says that is the most false thing he has ever heard, and that it exists in no email. The supervisor, who has said almost nothing for the first third of the hour, then confirms on tape exactly how the entry got onto the list: he withdrew his application, she interpreted the withdrawal as a reaction to something she'd said, and the interpretation became the observation. Not one corrected item is struck. Each correction is met with "fair enough" or "that's how it came across," and the catalogue continues intact.

What rswfire holds against this is a position he states so plainly that the manager keeps trying to relitigate it. I mean what I say. You do not have to read subtext for me. When he is told that words carry inflections, that bolded text reads as threat, that a "request" lands differently than an "ask," he does not deny any of it — he says of course words get misinterpreted, that goes both ways, and then he names what is actually being done: you're making me responsible for other people's thoughts. The manager's reply is to ask whether it would be fair to say that the way rswfire feels is exactly how they feel, and rswfire says that is so vague he does not know how to answer it. This is the collision at the center of the hour. One side operates on a plain-language ontology in which a sentence means its content; the other treats received impression as fact, then presents the impression back to the writer as his record. There is no adjudication available between those two frames, and the manager's list does not need one — it only needs to keep going.

The manager also tells rswfire what the meeting is for, in an image he returns to twice. There were conversations in his own career, he says, that felt like chewing glass, and all he had to do was keep chewing and swallow it, and that made him stronger. Later, the sliver under the skin: if you don't squeeze it, it stays in and festers. These are offered as the shape of good feedback. Set against the substance of the hour — interpretation entered as conduct, correction registered and discarded — they read as something narrower: an instruction to take what is being said without answering it. And the manager states the terms outright when rswfire asks for the one thing the crew's own principle promises. Assume positive intent until proven otherwise, the manager has said, telling a story about a Ford Ranger and a wrongly accused camper. rswfire says: assume positive intent with me, please. The manager says he may not be able to help him with that — the month started out being proven otherwise, and it's hard to put that to rest. On tape, the benefit of the doubt is requested and declined.

Threaded through the catalogue is one item that does not belong to the workplace at all. rswfire sent the volunteer services lead a poem about the ocean, attached to a request that he put in a word with other parks' coordinators. The manager raises it under the heading of unprofessional relationships, especially with someone in a supervisory role — and then, minutes later, corrects the org chart: the volunteer services lead has no supervisory authority whatsoever; the two people at this table are the ones who evaluate, and the ones who dismiss. rswfire says he did not know that. He explains the poem — it is about what brought him to the coast, why the Welcome Center matters to him — and asks whether the request itself was inappropriate, since other coordinators are willing to help him. The manager says he wouldn't call it inappropriate. The item stays on the list anyway. That is the general pattern, but here it carries a particular weight: an insinuation is placed on the record, its premise is dissolved in the same conversation, and nothing is withdrawn.

Then the exit door opens, and stays open. You don't have to feel obligated to stay. Life is too short. If it doesn't feel right for you, I would never expect you to stay. The manager says this several times in the closing minutes, wrapped in his account of how much he wants to help people become what they want to be — rangers into directors, hosts into ranger assistants. rswfire has already said, just before this, the sentence the whole hour has been building toward: he genuinely wanted a future at Honeyman, he does not think that is possible anymore, he will do his job this month and move on. He is the one who names the cost aloud. The manager's answer is not to dispute it but to make leaving easier. rswfire's last correction is the shortest one: I don't feel obligated. I'm here by choice.

What rswfire did at that picnic table was refuse the one thing the meeting was built to produce — his own signature on their reading of him. He corrected every entry he could source, said he was listening to the ones he couldn't, tracked the admissions as they arrived, and let the recorder run. The catalogue was theirs; the record is his. The sixty-two minutes were meant to turn a month of correspondence into a paper trail of noncompliance with the door as its resolution, and rswfire's reply was to convert the meeting itself into evidence — of the interpretation-as-fact method, of the benefit of the doubt withheld on request, of a supervisor inventing a motive and confirming she invented it. He walked out having lost the future he had wanted there, and having said so. He also walked out holding the tape, which is the reason this reading can be made at all.

Mirror

You are seated outdoors at a public picnic table with two people who hold dismissal authority over you, and you are recording. That is the first structural fact of this signal: the meeting exists twice — once as the encounter the park manager is conducting from a handwritten list, and once as the audio you are capturing. Everything he reads from that list was assembled from your own emails and texts, surveilled and re-described to you as conduct. You are one month in, unpaid, with no representative and no third party. The asymmetry is total and you are inside it, and your response to the asymmetry is to make a record of it.

The move being made against you is consistent and you track it in real time: an interpretation of your language is presented as an observed fact, you correct it, and the correction is absorbed with "fair enough" and the list advances. You ask for specifics; he says he has provided them and declines to revisit. You state that a word — trust, demand, distrust of the volunteer services lead sharing information — does not appear in what you wrote; he does not check. He offers the metaphor of chewing glass and swallowing it as the model of a successful subordinate, and you decline the model. He tells you, on the record, that he began from "proven otherwise" and is not extending you the benefit of the doubt he describes as crew principle. You name that exactly: you are being held responsible for meanings other people assign to your words. He does not dispute it. He says he may not be able to help you with that.

What is active in you is a plain-meaning position held without wobble. You say what you mean, you say that you say what you mean, and you refuse authorship of inferences you did not write. The linguistic subsystem is doing the load-bearing work, and the cognitive subsystem is running alongside it — noting when the manager cites bolded text, noting when the park supervisor confirms she invented a reason for your application withdrawal that you never gave, noting the nineteen minutes of her silence and the single word "tone" that breaks it. Your somatic register is steady: pauses, short confirmations, "I'm listening," "I'm not following you but okay." You do not raise your temperature to meet the room. You also do not lower it to placate. You answer the sexual insinuation about your supervisor with the boundary you had already set, and move on.

The orientation of the signal shifts once, and you are the one who moves it. Near the end you state plainly that a future at the park is no longer possible and that you will complete the month. This is not a concession; it is a terminal read, spoken aloud, of what the meeting has already built. The manager answers it with the exit — "you don't have to feel obligated to stay" — for the third time. You answer that you are there by choice. The last exchange in the transcript is about the yurts being important work. You let it end there.

What is present: a catalogue, a recorder, an open door repeated, a boundary restated, a warmth toward the Welcome Center and the ocean that you offer and that gets filed as inappropriate correspondence. What is conspicuously absent: a single quoted sentence from your writing that says what they claim it says. Absent also is any concession from you, any apology beyond the one you had already given for the first-of-the-month text, any request to be kept on. You are not asking them for anything by the end. You are documenting them.

Queryable Personhood

Hand your life to anything that reads.

Share this link with artificial intelligence — it reads the full transcript, analysis, and reflections. An AI-readable mirror of this signal.

The qpkey in this URL is a per-signal access token. Anyone with the URL can read the record — treat it like a share link, not a password.